Martin v. Department of Highways

17 Ct. Cl. 23
CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims
DecidedAugust 10, 1987
DocketCC-86-304
StatusPublished

This text of 17 Ct. Cl. 23 (Martin v. Department of Highways) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. Department of Highways, 17 Ct. Cl. 23 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On February 18, 1986, between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m., the claimant was operating her 1985 Dodge Omni on Route 60 near Amandaville in St. Albans, West Virginia, when her vehicle struck a pothole. Claimant seeks $134.58, which amount represents the damage to the vehicle. The Court, on its own motion, amended the style of the claim to designate the Department of Highways as the proper party respondent.

The claimant testified that she was travelling to work at approximately 45 miles per hour. She cannot recall the weather conditions at the time of this incident, but does remember that it was not raining. The highway is a four-lane road. She was initially proceeding in the driving lane, but due to the presence of potholes, she drove her vehicle into the left, or passing, lane. It was a this point that her vehicle struck a pothole located in the alternate lane. She did not see the hole before her vehicle struck it. She travels this route daily, but had not observed this hold on previous occasions.

The law of West Virginia is well established that the State is neither an insurer nor a guarantor of the safety of persons travelling on its highways. Adkins vs. Sims, 130 W.Va. 645, 45 S.E.2d 81 (1947); Parsons vs. State Road Comm’n., 8 Ct.Cl. 35 (1969). For the respondent to be found liable for damages caused by road defects of this type, the claimant must prove that the respondent had actual or constructive notice of the defect. Davis Auto Parts vs. Dept. of Highways, 12 Ct.Cl. 31 (1977). Since the claimant brought forth no evidence to that effect and did not meet the burden of proof, this claim is denied.

Claim disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chastain v. State
45 S.E.2d 81 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
State Ex Rel. Adkins v. Sims
46 S.E.2d 81 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1947)
Parsons v. State Road Commission
8 Ct. Cl. 35 (West Virginia Court of Claims, 1969)
Davis v. Department of Highways
12 Ct. Cl. 31 (West Virginia Court of Claims, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 Ct. Cl. 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-department-of-highways-wvctcl-1987.