Martin v. D.C. Jail

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided February 15, 2011·No. Civil Action No. 2010-1957·Published

Opinion

UN1TE1) STATES DISTRICT CoURT F I L E D FoR THE DISTRICT oF CoLuMBIA

FEB 1 5 2011 Clerk, U.S. DlsDtrict &t B;xrékrlulltct:’\i/ t h ' t` 0 oum a ANTHoNY ANroNio MARTIN, ) °°""s °" ° 'S "°

)

Plaintiff, )

v_ ) Civil Action N0. l0-1957

D.C. JAIL, et al., ) )

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Court has allowed the above-captioned action to be provisionally filed. Before the Court would consider the plaintiff’ s complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff was directed to submit a certified copy of his trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent), including the supporting ledger sheets, for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this complaint, obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which plaintiff is or was confined. 28 U.S.C. § l9l5. To date, plaintiff has not submitted the required information Accordingly, the Court will deny his application to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss the complaint without prejudice

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

DATE; /§A/c 520/l united Statesoi§rnct.rud /

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. D.C. Jail, (D.D.C. 2011).

Martin v. D.C. Jail (Martin v. D.C. Jail) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.