Martin v. Davidson

559 N.E.2d 1348, 53 Ohio St. 3d 240, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1036
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 5, 1990·No. No. 89-1076·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinions

This cause came before the court upon the certification of the court of appeals that its judgment conflicted with the judgment of the Court of Appeals for Knox County in Beck v. Jolliff (1984), 22 Ohio App. 3d 84, 22 OBR 237, 489 N.E. 2d 825, upon the following question:

“* * * [W]hether an action to determine a father-child relationship may be commenced against the estate of the alleged father after his death but within the time otherwise provided by law.”

However, because we find that the court of common pleas, probate division, had no subject matter jurisdiction in this matter, we vacate the judgments of both the court of common pleas and the court of appeals and dismiss the certification.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur. Holmes, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. Davidson, 559 N.E.2d 1348, 53 Ohio St. 3d 240, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1036 (Ohio 1990).

559 N.E.2d 1348 (Martin v. Davidson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoover v. Pfeifer
2025 Ohio 4909 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2025)
Ehman v. Harvey
2023 Ohio 1129 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2023)
Carr v. Acacia Country Club Co.
2012 Ohio 1940 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2012)
Dircksen v. Dircksen, Unpublished Decision (12-27-2004)
2004 Ohio 7041 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)
Byrd v. Trennor
811 N.E.2d 549 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)
Brookbank v. Gray
1996 Ohio 135 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)
In Re Estate of Hicks
629 N.E.2d 1086 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1993)