Martin v. David

456 N.W.2d 294, 235 Neb. 599, 1990 Neb. LEXIS 200
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided June 15, 1990·No. No. 88-835·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of the record, briefs, and recommendation of the Appellate Division of the District Court, we find that the trial court abused its discretion in the admission of opinion testimony, and therefore the judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. David, 456 N.W.2d 294, 235 Neb. 599, 1990 Neb. LEXIS 200 (Neb. 1990).

456 N.W.2d 294 (Martin v. David) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.