Martin v. David

456 N.W.2d 294, 235 Neb. 599, 1990 Neb. LEXIS 200
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1990
DocketNo. 88-835
StatusPublished

This text of 456 N.W.2d 294 (Martin v. David) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. David, 456 N.W.2d 294, 235 Neb. 599, 1990 Neb. LEXIS 200 (Neb. 1990).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of the record, briefs, and recommendation of the Appellate Division of the District Court, we find that the trial court abused its discretion in the admission of opinion testimony, and therefore the judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
456 N.W.2d 294, 235 Neb. 599, 1990 Neb. LEXIS 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-david-neb-1990.