Martin v. Danko

18 A.2d 324, 143 Pa. Super. 106, 1941 Pa. Super. LEXIS 17
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 11, 1940·No. Appeal, 125·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The judgment of the court below as to the right of the plaintiff tax collector to demand, collect and receive from the defendant employer, under section 1(c) of the Act of June 20, 1939, P. L. 508, 72 PS sec. 5544.1(c), the taxes due by an employee of the defendant for the years 1932, 1933, 1935,1936, 1937 and 1939, is affirmed on the clear and convincing opinion of Judge Carr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. Danko, 18 A.2d 324, 143 Pa. Super. 106, 1941 Pa. Super. LEXIS 17 (Pa. Ct. App. 1940).

18 A.2d 324 (Martin v. Danko) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Com. v. Shivers, J.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2018
Mezanko v. Blue Coal Corp.
68 Pa. D. & C.2d 374 (Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas, 1974)
Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Messner
13 Pa. D. & C.2d 497 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1957)
Pope v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty Insurance
107 A.2d 191 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1954)
Wyckoff v. Clark
77 Pa. D. & C. 249 (Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas, 1951)
Monroe Loan Soc. of Pa. v. Morello
51 A.2d 347 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1946)
Monaca Borough School District v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
50 Pa. D. & C. 671 (Beaver County Court of Common Pleas, 1943)