Martin v. Crusty Pie Co.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Martin v. Crusty Pie Co.

147 A.2d 232, 1959 D.C. App. LEXIS 213

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided January 2, 1959·No. No. 2285·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case arose out of a collision between two automobiles at a street intersection. The trial court found that the collision was due to appellants’ negligence, and entered judgment for damages caused to ap-pellee’s truck.

Appellants’ contentions concern negligence, contributory negligence as a matter of law, and proximate cause. We have carefully considered the transcript and find that the issues were factual. We are satisfied that appellants have failed to sustain their burden of persuading us that we should reject the findings of the trier and substitute others favorable to them.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case arose out of a collision between two automobiles at a street intersection. The trial court found that the collision was due to appellants’ negligence, and entered judgment for damages caused to ap-pellee’s truck.

Appellants’ contentions concern negligence, contributory negligence as a matter of law, and proximate cause. We have carefully considered the transcript and find that the issues were factual. We are satisfied that appellants have failed to sustain their burden of persuading us that we should reject the findings of the trier and substitute others favorable to them.

Affirmed.

Martin v. Crusty Pie Co., 147 A.2d 232, 1959 D.C. App. LEXIS 213 (D.C. 1959).

Pincite

147 A.2d 232 (Martin v. Crusty Pie Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.