Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Martin v. Cooley

Martin v. Cooley

86 S.E. 947, 17 Ga. App. 376, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 431
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 20, 1915
Docket6505
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 86 S.E. 947 (Martin v. Cooley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. Cooley, 86 S.E. 947, 17 Ga. App. 376, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 431 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

The ease was tried in a city court, and, after verdict for the plaintiff, it was taken by certiorari to the superior court. In the petition for certiorari error is assigned upon the overruling of a demurrer. to the plaintiff’s petition, and upon the overruling of a motion for a new trial. It does not appear wherein the court erred in overruling the demurrer, and since there was evidence amply supporting the verdict for the plaintiff, the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Little v. Peoples Bank
7 S.E.2d 397 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Jones v. Knightstown Body Co.
184 S.E. 427 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 S.E. 947, 17 Ga. App. 376, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-cooley-gactapp-1915.