Martin v. Commissioner

1959 T.C. Memo. 107, 18 T.C.M. 479, 1959 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 137
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin v. Commissioner. Read the opinion of the Court — 36 T.C. 556
United States Tax Court·Decided May 26, 1959·No. Docket No. 66224.·Unpublished

Opinion

Edward G. Martin and Stella Martin v. Commissioner.
Martin v. Commissioner
Docket No. 66224.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1959-107; 1959 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 137; 18 T.C.M. (CCH) 479; T.C.M. (RIA) 59107;
May 26, 1959
E. Willard Murnane, Esq., 1106 Commerce Building, St. Paul, Minn., for the petitioners. Sylvan Siegler, Esq., for the respondent.

TURNER

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

TURNER, Judge: The respondent determined a deficiency in income tax against the petitioners for the taxable year 1952 in the amount of $4,143.86. The question for decision is whether the proceeds from the sale of the capital stock of a corporation may be reported on the installment basis, under the provisions of section 44(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939.

Findings of Fact

Some of the facts have been stipulated and are found as stipulated.

Petitioners are husband and wife and are residents of White Bear Lake, Minnesota. They filed their joint income tax return for*138 the taxable year involved with the district director of internal revenue for Minnesota. They kept their books and filed their returns on a cash basis.

For an undisclosed period prior to December 1, 1952, petitioners owned 20 shares of stock of the White Bear Wine & Liquor Shop, Inc., hereafter referred to as the corporation. This stock constituted all of the issued and outstanding stock of the corporation. The corporation was engaged in the retail business of selling wine, liquor, beer and related merchandise. It conducted its business in a building owned by petitioner Stella Martin, which it rented under a written lease, at a monthly rental of $100. Prior to May 31, 1952, the termination date of its lease, it requested that it be permitted to make certain improvements to the building. An agreement was reached with Stella providing for a method of payment for the proposed improvements. This agreement was incorporated in a new lease executed on May 1, 1952, which was for a term of ten years, commencing on June 1, 1952.

The new lease provided for monthly rental payments of $150, and as to payment for the improvements, provided as follows:

"It is understood and agreed that in consideration*139 of the Lessees [Lessee] making improvements to the said real estate, that fifty ($50.00) dollars of the said rental agreement shall be applied to the cost of said improvement and shall continue until the said improvement cost has been fully paid.

"It is further agreed that the Lessee shall provide the Lessor with an itemized statement of the cost of said improvement and upon approval by the Lessor, prior to the 1st day of June, 1952, a deduction of fifty ($50.00) dollars per month shall be made until the total amount is fully paid, and should the sum of fifty ($50.00) dollars be inadequate, it shall then be amortized over the ten (10) year period and any funds or money expended by the said Lessee for the improvement of said premises shall be without interest."

The proposed improvements to the building were made in 1952, at an approximate cost of $3,500. On June 12, 1952, the corporation borrowed $3,500 from the First State Bank of White Bear Lake, to pay for the improvements, and on that date issued to the bank its promissory note in that amount. The note bore interest at the rate of 4 1/2 per cent per annum, payable semiannually, with the principal due on or before September 12, 1952. Thereafter*140 the corporation issued a new promissory note to the bank, also in the amount of $3,500. This new note was executed on September 12, 1952, and bore interest at the rate of 5 per cent per annum, payable semi-annually, with the principal amount due on or before December 12, 1952. Except for date of execution, due date and interest rate, the two promissory notes were identical in every material respect. Upon execution of the second note, the first note was canceled.

On December 1, 1952, the petitioners entered into a contract with Stanley T. Wiatros and Joseph J. Wiatros and Delores R. Wiatros, husband and wife, to sell their 20 shares of stock of the corporation. The agreement provided in part as follows:

"THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 1st day of December, 1952, by and between, Edward G. Martin and Stella Martin, husband and wife, of White Bear Lake, Minnesota, hereafter referred to as Sellers and Stanley T. Wiatros and Joseph J. Wiatros and Delores R. Wiatros, husband and wife, hereafter referred to as Purchasers:

"WHEREAS, Edward G. Martin and Stella Martin are owners of all of the issued and outstanding stock of the corporation known as, White Bear Lake Wine and*141 Liquor Shop, Inc., and are desirous of selling said stock to the Purchasers and to place the management and control and operation of said corporation in the hands of said Purchasers and

"WHEREAS, said corporation is engaged in the retail sale of wine, liquors and beer and other related stock of merchandise and it is the desire of all parties to continue said corporation in active business, and

"WHEREAS, said sale will involve a part payment of cash and the balance in installment payments and it is the desire of the parties hereto to properly secure the Sellers until said Sellers shall be paid in full the price as set forth herein,

"NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein made to be kept and performed by each of the parties hereto it is agreed between the parties as follows:

"1. Sellers grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Purchasers their heirs, administrators and assigns forever 20 shares of the capital stock of the White Bear Lake Wine and Liquor Shop, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, to have and to hold the same forever. Sellers for themselves, their heirs, executors and assigns covenant and agree to and with the Purchasers their heirs and assigns*142

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. Commissioner, 1959 T.C. Memo. 107, 18 T.C.M. 479, 1959 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 137 (tax 1959).

1959 T.C. Memo. 107 (Martin v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.