Martin v. Colvin

Fourth Circuit

Martin v. Colvin

672 F. App'x 331

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 13, 2017

DocketNo. 15-1422

StatusPublished

This text of 672 F. App'x 331 (Martin v. Colvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. Colvin, 672 F. App'x 331 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Johnny Martin appeals the district court’s order upholding the Commissioner’s denial of his applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Martin v. Colvin, No. 5:14-cv-00032-RLV, 2015 WL 1602077 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 9, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Johnny Martin appeals the district court’s order upholding the Commissioner’s denial of his applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Martin v. Colvin, No. 5:14-cv-00032-RLV, 2015 WL 1602077 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 9, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

672 F. App'x 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-colvin-ca4-2017.