Martin v. City of Searcy
909 S.W.2d 652, 322 Ark. 562, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 674
Opinion
Appellant Johnny Martin, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.
His attorney, Robert Meurer, admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part.
We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. City of Searcy, 909 S.W.2d 652, 322 Ark. 562, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 674 (Ark. 1995).
909 S.W.2d 652 (Martin v. City of Searcy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barnett v. City of Dardanelle
920 S.W.2d 855 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1996)