Martin v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
This text of 156 N.W. 1087 (Martin v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case tbe judgment of tbe court below must stand, because tbe five sitting justices are divided on tbe question as to whether tbe judgment should be affirmed or reversed. Three of tbe justices, Chief Justice WiNslow and Justices YiNje and RoseNbebby, favor affirmance, while Justice Siebecxee and the writer favor reversal.
By the Court. — Judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
156 N.W. 1087, 162 Wis. 595, 1916 Wisc. LEXIS 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-chicago-milwaukee-st-paul-railway-co-wis-1916.