Martin v. Chicago, Duluth & Georgian Bay Transit Co.

194 Ill. App. 480, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 525
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedOctober 5, 1915
DocketGen. No. 20,652
StatusPublished

This text of 194 Ill. App. 480 (Martin v. Chicago, Duluth & Georgian Bay Transit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. Chicago, Duluth & Georgian Bay Transit Co., 194 Ill. App. 480, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 525 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Pleading, § 434*—what is effect of allegation under a videlicet. Where an allegation in a declaration is made under a videlicet, the date is immaterial. 4. Appeal and errob, § 1526*—when instruction harmless. An instruction which inaccurately states the date when the contract sued upon was made, as a result of a similarly inaccurate allegation in the declaration, under a videlicet, though ordinarily reversible error, becomes harmless where the evidence will sustain no other verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 Ill. App. 480, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-chicago-duluth-georgian-bay-transit-co-illappct-1915.