Martin v. Cauthen
This text of 77 Ga. 491 (Martin v. Cauthen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The point in this case is, whether, to procession land under sections 2384, 2385, 2386, it is necessary to run all [492]*492around the tract in its entirety belonging to and possessed by the owner, or only around one lot alone under grant of the State, that lot whereupon the line is uncertain or disputed.
The question is not open in this court. Watson vs. Bishop et-al., 69 Ga. 51; Rattaree vs. Morrow, 71 Id. 528 These cases settle the law to be that the entire tract must be marked and surveyed all around it, and that the entire tract is not one lot or any other part of the body of land lying together of the owner, but it is the whole body of land.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 Ga. 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-cauthen-ga-1886.