Martin v. Carter
68 S.E. 849, 8 Ga. App. 178, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 87
Opinion
1: Where facts are involved, the first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed; and even where the first grant of a new trial depends upon the legal construction of the evidence, the judge’s view of tlie law will not be closely scanned.
2. Where a wrong reason is assigned for the grant of a new trial, and yet it is apparent that there was good reason why a new trial should have been granted, the discretion of the trial judge will not be controlled. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. Carter, 68 S.E. 849, 8 Ga. App. 178, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 87 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).
68 S.E. 849 (Martin v. Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.