Martin v. Capel

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Martin v. Capel

62 S.E.2d 50, 232 N.C. 733, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 611

DecidedNovember 29, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 62 S.E.2d 50 (Martin v. Capel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. Capel, 62 S.E.2d 50, 232 N.C. 733, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 611 (N.C. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only exception appearing on tbe record is “To the signing of the judgment,” which is also' assigned as error. There are' eleven other assignments of error, following the case on appeal, but these are non-exceptive. Hence, the only question presented is whether error appears on the face of the record. Terry v. Capital Ice & Coal Co., 231 N.C. 103, 55 S.E. 2d 926. We find none.

Judgment affirmed.

JohnsoN, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The only exception appearing on tbe record is “To the signing of the judgment,” which is also' assigned as error. There are' eleven other assignments of error, following the case on appeal, but these are non-exceptive. Hence, the only question presented is whether error appears on the face of the record. Terry v. Capital Ice & Coal Co., 231 N.C. 103, 55 S.E. 2d 926. We find none.

Judgment affirmed.

JohnsoN, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 S.E.2d 50, 232 N.C. 733, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-capel-nc-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack