Martin v. Capel

62 S.E.2d 50, 232 N.C. 733, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 611
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 29, 1950·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only exception appearing on tbe record is “To the signing of the judgment,” which is also' assigned as error. There are' eleven other assignments of error, following the case on appeal, but these are non-exceptive. Hence, the only question presented is whether error appears on the face of the record. Terry v. Capital Ice & Coal Co., 231 N.C. 103, 55 S.E. 2d 926. We find none.

Judgment affirmed.

JohnsoN, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. Capel, 62 S.E.2d 50, 232 N.C. 733, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 611 (N.C. 1950).

62 S.E.2d 50 (Martin v. Capel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Terry v. Capital Ice & Coal Co.
55 S.E.2d 926 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)