Martin v. Cameron

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Martin v. Cameron

263 A.D. 759, 30 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4841

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 12, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 759 (Martin v. Cameron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. Cameron, 263 A.D. 759, 30 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4841 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, at Special Term for Broome County, which denied as a matter of law appellants’ application for an order in the nature of prohibition. Order affirmed, without costs, solely upon the authority of Matter of McKinney v. Hamilton (282 N. Y. 393). Hill, P. J., Bliss, Schenck and Foster, JJ., concur; Crapser, J., dissents and votes to reverse. The crime of petit larceny as charged against the appellants was made in the Police Court of Endicott, N. Y., a Court of Special Sessions. In view of the penalty permitted under section 1302 of the Penal Law,' the appellants applied for an order of prohibition upon the grounds the said police justice was without jurisdiction to impose the sentence. If the appellants are without funds the duration of their confinement is not within their control.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, at Special Term for Broome County, which denied as a matter of law appellants’ application for an order in the nature of prohibition. Order affirmed, without costs, solely upon the authority of Matter of McKinney v. Hamilton (282 N. Y. 393). Hill, P. J., Bliss, Schenck and Foster, JJ., concur; Crapser, J., dissents and votes to reverse. The crime of petit larceny as charged against the appellants was made in the Police Court of Endicott, N. Y., a Court of Special Sessions. In view of the penalty permitted under section 1302 of the Penal Law,' the appellants applied for an order of prohibition upon the grounds the said police justice was without jurisdiction to impose the sentence. If the appellants are without funds the duration of their confinement is not within their control.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 759, 30 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-cameron-nyappdiv-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack