Martin v. Burrows

2 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 35
CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island
DecidedFebruary 28, 1919
DocketNo. 42695
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 35 (Martin v. Burrows) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. Burrows, 2 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 35 (R.I. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

RESCRIPT

BLODGETT, J.

Heard upon motion for a new trial filed by defendant after a verdiet of the jury for the plaintiff for $3,000. The only ground urged in support of the motion to the trial court is that the amount is excessive.

The plaintiff -was struck by an automobile driven by an agent of defendant and claims to have suffered a severe nervous shock and an injury to her shoulder of a permanent character, which will cause a disfigurement for the rest of her life.

Upon examination of the testimony of Dr. Edmund D. Chasebro, the only physician who testified in the case, the Court cannot say that the amount awarded by the jury is so excessive as to shoek the conscience of the Court.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-burrows-risuperct-1919.