Martin v. Broward General Medical Center

332 So. 2d 84, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14378
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 7, 1976
DocketNo. 75-1535
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 332 So. 2d 84 (Martin v. Broward General Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. Broward General Medical Center, 332 So. 2d 84, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14378 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

TROWBRIDGE, C. PFEIFFER, Associate Judge.

Plaintiff, after undergoing numerous examinations by private physicians, voluntarily committed herself to South Florida State Hospital. Defendant, Dr. Edmee Linares, an employee of the State Hospital, diagnosed Plaintiff’s condition as a hysterical neurosis of the conversion type. Plaintiff was thereafter treated in all respects as a psychiatric patient during her commitment.

Upon her discharge, Plaintiff continued to suffer from weakness and paralysis. Ultimately it was ascertained that her problem was not of a psychiatric origin, but rather from a neurological disease. She thereupon brought the instant suit against several doctors and hospitals including Dr. Edmee Linares. Recovery was sought against Dr. Linares only to the extent of the doctor’s privately obtained liability coverage.

The trial court dismissed the complaint as to Dr. Linares and the insurance carrier upon a finding of governmental immunity and the case of Loucks v. Adair, 312 So.2d 531 (1st DCA Fla.1973).

Plaintiff appeals claiming that Fla.Stat. § 394.459 establishes the doctor’s liability for negligence. This claim was found invalid in Loucks, supra, and we concur in the reasoning of our sister court.

The second theory of recovery is based upon the insurance coverage obtained by Dr. Linares. However, no general law of Florida waives the sovereign immunity of the State (not sued here) or of its employees acting within the course and scope of their official duties. Accordingly, the insurance policy is irrelevant to the issues here.

Affirmed.

CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atwater v. Broward County
556 So. 2d 1161 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Rupp v. Bryant
417 So. 2d 658 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports, 1976

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
332 So. 2d 84, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-broward-general-medical-center-fladistctapp-1976.