Martin v. Britts Home Furnishings
This text of 223 S.E.2d 757 (Martin v. Britts Home Furnishings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
" 'The burden is always on the appellant in asserting error to show it affirmatively by the record.’ ” Smith v. Forrester, 132 Ga. App. 426 (1) (208 SE2d 199) and cases cited. Defendants below filed their motion for new trial upon the general grounds only and enumerate as the sole error the overruling of that motion. In their notice of appeal they state that the transcript of the evidence will not be filed for inclusion in the record, and no transcript has been forwarded to this court. In these circumstances the judgment must be affirmed. Pastis v. Haverty Furniture Companies., 134 Ga. App. 9 (213 SE2d 161).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
223 S.E.2d 757, 137 Ga. App. 360, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-britts-home-furnishings-gactapp-1976.