Martin v. Bradley

1 Cai. Cas. 124
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1803
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 1 Cai. Cas. 124 (Martin v. Bradley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. Bradley, 1 Cai. Cas. 124 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1803).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The law has been settled, both from the time of Dyer and Fitzherbert, as stated by the counsel for the defendant; judgment must, therefore, be in favor of the demurrer.

Judgment for the demurrant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hegerich v. . Keddie
1 N.E. 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1885)
Stanley v. Vogel
9 Mo. App. 98 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1880)
Moies v. Sprague, Administrator
9 R.I. 541 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1870)
People v. Gibbs
9 Wend. 29 (New York Supreme Court, 1832)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Cai. Cas. 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-bradley-nysupct-1803.