Martin v. Bradley

1 Cai. Cas. 124
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1803·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The law has been settled, both from the time of Dyer and Fitzherbert, as stated by the counsel for the defendant; judgment must, therefore, be in favor of the demurrer.

Judgment for the demurrant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. Bradley, 1 Cai. Cas. 124 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1803).

1 Cai. Cas. 124 (Martin v. Bradley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hegerich v. . Keddie
1 N.E. 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1885)
Stanley v. Vogel
9 Mo. App. 98 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1880)
Moies v. Sprague, Administrator
9 R.I. 541 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1870)
People v. Gibbs
9 Wend. 29 (New York Supreme Court, 1832)