Martin v. Bradley
This text of 1 Cai. Cas. 124 (Martin v. Bradley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The law has been settled, both from the time of Dyer and Fitzherbert, as stated by the counsel for the defendant; judgment must, therefore, be in favor of the demurrer.
Judgment for the demurrant.
) S. P. 1 Roll. Abr. 921; Mason v. Dix, W. Jones, 173; S. C. Latch, 167. But an executor may bring case against a sheriff for a false return of a levy Williams v. Carey, 1 Salk. 12. Though the executors of a sheriff cannot maintain case against a gaoler for an escape of prisoners committed to his custody by their testator. Kain and others v. Ostrander, 8 Johns. Rep. 207. See also The People v. Gibbs, 9 Wend. 29; Gravath v. Plympton, 13 Mass, R. 454.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Cai. Cas. 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-bradley-nysupct-1803.