Martin v. Blackwell
This text of 73 S.E. 629 (Martin v. Blackwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon the consideration of the motion to dismiss the appeal it is ordered that the motion be refused. The Court will not dismiss an appeal merely because the stenographer has lost the notes of testimony. If the appellant is not able to comply with the demands of the respondent in making up the case and they carahot make up an agreed case, the remedy of the parties is to apply to the Circuit Judge under the statutes and rules of the Court to settle the case.
In this instance the time of the respondents to serve amendments to the proposed case has already elapsed, but under the circumstances it is ordered that the respondents have four days in which to serve their amendments to the proposed case, and that the matter proceed thereafter regularly under the statutes and rules of the Court.
Time for serving proposed amendments extended ten days.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 S.E. 629, 90 S.C. 351, 1912 S.C. LEXIS 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-blackwell-sc-1912.