Martin v. Big Apple Deli, LLC

671 F. App'x 48
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 28, 2016
DocketNo. 15-2578
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 671 F. App'x 48 (Martin v. Big Apple Deli, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. Big Apple Deli, LLC, 671 F. App'x 48 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James C. Martin appeals, from the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss his civil action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(5) for insufficient service of process. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s decision to dismiss the complaint. See Cardenas v. City of Chi., 646 F.3d 1001, 1005 (7th Cir. 2011) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin v. Big Apple Deli, LLC, No. 1:14-cv-03042-GLR (D. Md. Nov. 19, 2015). However, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m), we modify the district court’s order to a dismissal without prejudice. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
671 F. App'x 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-big-apple-deli-llc-ca4-2016.