Martin v. Bernsley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Martin v. Bernsley

265 A.D.2d 531, 696 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10764

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 25, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 265 A.D.2d 531 (Martin v. Bernsley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin v. Bernsley, 265 A.D.2d 531, 696 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to [532]*532foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Gilda Bernsley appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.), dated May 13, 1998, which denied her motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (3) to vacate a judgment of the same court (Franco, J.), dated February 22, 1996.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant did not meet her burden of establishing usury by clear and convincing evidence (see, Giventer v Arnow, 37 NY2d 305; Lloyd Capital Corp. v Pat Henchar, Inc., 80 NY2d 124; Feinberg v Old Vestal Rd. Assocs., 157 AD2d 1002).

The appellant’s remaining contentions do not require reversal. Joy, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to [532]*532foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Gilda Bernsley appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.), dated May 13, 1998, which denied her motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (3) to vacate a judgment of the same court (Franco, J.), dated February 22, 1996.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant did not meet her burden of establishing usury by clear and convincing evidence (see, Giventer v Arnow, 37 NY2d 305; Lloyd Capital Corp. v Pat Henchar, Inc., 80 NY2d 124; Feinberg v Old Vestal Rd. Assocs., 157 AD2d 1002).

The appellant’s remaining contentions do not require reversal. Joy, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 A.D.2d 531, 696 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-bernsley-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack