Martin v. Bernsley

265 A.D.2d 531, 696 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10764
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 25, 1999·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—In an action to [532]*532foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Gilda Bernsley appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.), dated May 13, 1998, which denied her motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (3) to vacate a judgment of the same court (Franco, J.), dated February 22, 1996.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant did not meet her burden of establishing usury by clear and convincing evidence (see, Giventer v Arnow, 37 NY2d 305; Lloyd Capital Corp. v Pat Henchar, Inc., 80 NY2d 124; Feinberg v Old Vestal Rd. Assocs., 157 AD2d 1002).

The appellant’s remaining contentions do not require reversal. Joy, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. Bernsley, 265 A.D.2d 531, 696 N.Y.S.2d 870, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

265 A.D.2d 531 (Martin v. Bernsley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fora Fin. Asset Securitization 2021, LLC v. D-K Recycling, LLC
2024 NY Slip Op 33060(U) (New York Supreme Court, Nassau County, 2024)
Zhavoronkin v. Koutmine
52 A.D.3d 597 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Ujueta v. Euro-Quest Corp.
29 A.D.3d 895 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)