Martin v. Balkcom

122 S.E.2d 216, 217 Ga. 347, 1961 Ga. LEXIS 448
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 9, 1961·No. 21388·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Quillian, Justice.

The assignment of error in the bill of exceptions is that the trial judge erred in refusing to sanction a petition for the writ of habeas corpus. The petition was not incorporated in the bill of exceptions or otherwise verified by the judge. Accordingly, as ruled in the case of Blanchard v. Balkcom, 217 Ga. 334, the writ of error must be

Dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin v. Balkcom, 122 S.E.2d 216, 217 Ga. 347, 1961 Ga. LEXIS 448 (Ga. 1961).

122 S.E.2d 216 (Martin v. Balkcom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bearden v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
176 S.E.2d 652 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Sumner v. State Highway Department
139 S.E.2d 493 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)