Martin v. Anderson
This text of 19 Ind. 128 (Martin v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Complaint for a review of a judgment, by the appellants against the appellees. Demurrer to the complaint sustained. The judgment sought to be reviewed was rendered by default, upon a bill of exchange. The errors complained of in the original judgment are alleged errors of law appearing upon the face of the proceedings. The first is, that a copy of the bill was not set out. This is a mistake; an amendment of the transcript shows that a copy of the bill was filed. The complaint also alleged that the plaintiffs duly presented the bill for payment, and notified the drawer of its dishonor. Indeed, there is no defect in the complaint, nor is there any error in the original judgment, a transcript of which is set out and made a part of the complaint herein.
The judgment below is affirmed, with costs and five p'er cent, damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 Ind. 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-anderson-ind-1862.