Martin v. Ambler
9 A. 490, 6 Sadler 312, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 609
Opinion
On the facts found' by the learned judge and fully sustained by the evidence, there was no error in granting the preliminary injunction, and in refusing to dissolve the same.
That the appellant was reducing the value of the property, and lessening and endangering the security of the appellee, is clearly shown.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellant
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin v. Ambler, 9 A. 490, 6 Sadler 312, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 609 (Pa. 1887).
9 A. 490 (Martin v. Ambler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kremer v. Crase
244 N.W. 596 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1932)
Real Estate Trust Co. v. Hatton
45 A. 379 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1900)