Martin v. Alverez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Martin v. Alverez

21 A.D.3d 572, 799 N.Y.S.2d 921

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 24, 2005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to Election Law § 16-102 to invalidate petitions designating Kellie Alverez and Eugene L. Farrington as candidates in a primary election to be held on September 13, 2005, for the nomination of the Working Families Party as its candidates for the public office of Town Council Member, Town of Islip, James A. Duncan, Jr., Bertha M. Lewis, Robert E Master, and Jonathan Kest appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a final order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Whelan, J.), dated August 19, 2005, as granted the petition, invalidated the designating petitions, and denied their application to dismiss the proceeding on the ground that the petitioner failed to join necessary parties.

Ordered that the final order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly declared the certificates of authorization invalid.

The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Cozier, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to Election Law § 16-102 to invalidate petitions designating Kellie Alverez and Eugene L. Farrington as candidates in a primary election to be held on September 13, 2005, for the nomination of the Working Families Party as its candidates for the public office of Town Council Member, Town of Islip, James A. Duncan, Jr., Bertha M. Lewis, Robert E Master, and Jonathan Kest appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a final order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Whelan, J.), dated August 19, 2005, as granted the petition, invalidated the designating petitions, and denied their application to dismiss the proceeding on the ground that the petitioner failed to join necessary parties.

Ordered that the final order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly declared the certificates of authorization invalid.

The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Cozier, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Martin v. Alverez, 21 A.D.3d 572, 799 N.Y.S.2d 921 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

21 A.D.3d 572 (Martin v. Alverez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related