Martin v. Adorno & Yoss, LLP
This text of 983 So. 2d 744 (Martin v. Adorno & Yoss, LLP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Gregory A. MARTIN, Appellant,
v.
ADORNO & YOSS, L.L.P., Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
N. Fraser Schuh, for appellant.
Gilbride, Heller & Brown, and Dyanne E. Feinberg and Joshua D. Clark, Miami, for appellee.
Before GREEN, SUAREZ and CORTIÑAS, JJ.
SUAREZ, J.
Adorno & Yoss, L.L.P. ("Adorno") brought a claim against Gregory A. Martin, a former firm partner, for breach of *745 fiduciary duty. Adorno moved for summary judgment, and the parties submitted competing affidavits. The trial court granted Adorno's motion for summary judgment, and Martin has appealed.
This Court examined the record agreement and determined that issues of material fact remain to be resolved, rendering summary judgment inappropriate. We reverse the order granting summary judgment and remand accordingly for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
983 So. 2d 744, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 8463, 2008 WL 2356924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-adorno-yoss-llp-fladistctapp-2008.