Martin Tovar Zapata v. the State of Texas

CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
DecidedJune 12, 2026
Docket03-25-00909-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Martin Tovar Zapata v. the State of Texas (Martin Tovar Zapata v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin Tovar Zapata v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-25-00909-CR

Martin Tovar Zapata, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 427TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-DC-22-204696, THE HONORABLE TAMARA NEEDLES, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Martin Tovar Zapata has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. As an

initial matter, we note that the judgment adjudicating guilt erroneously recites appellant’s surname

as “Tavarzapata.” In response to questioning by the trial court, appellant stated that his surname

is in fact Tovar Zapata.

Appellate courts have the authority to correct or reform a judgment when the

necessary information is available to do so. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(b); Bigley v. State,

865 S.W.2d 26, 27–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993). Accordingly, we modify the judgment

adjudicating guilt in trial court cause number D-1-DC-22-204696 to reflect that appellant’s name

is “Martin Tovar Zapata.” See Tiscareno v. State, 608 S.W.3d 434, 443 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st

Dist.] 2020, pet. ref’d) (concluding that “the spelling of appellant’s name in the judgment does not

accurately comport with the record in this case” and modifying judgment). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is signed by both appellant and his attorney. See

Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See id.

__________________________________________ Rosa Lopez Theofanis, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Theofanis and Crump

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: June 12, 2026

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bigley v. State
865 S.W.2d 26 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Martin Tovar Zapata v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-tovar-zapata-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp3-2026.