Martin Sprocket & Gear, Inc. v. Adams

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Martin Sprocket & Gear, Inc. v. Adams

654 So. 2d 300, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4866, 1995 WL 259153

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 5, 1995

DocketNos. 94-1099, 94-1307

StatusPublished

This text of 654 So. 2d 300 (Martin Sprocket & Gear, Inc. v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin Sprocket & Gear, Inc. v. Adams, 654 So. 2d 300, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4866, 1995 WL 259153 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

MICKLE, Judge.

These consolidated appeals and cross-appeals arise from a final judgment rendered on a jury verdict in favor of appellees in a personal injury action. We conclude that the facts and the relevant law afford ample support for the jury’s verdict and the judgment entered pursuant to that verdict. Therefore, we affirm the issues raised in the main appeal without discussion. We also affirm ap-pellees’ cross-appeal challenging the set-off from the judgment of the amount paid in settlement by two co-defendants prior to trial. The trial court correctly awarded judgment against appellants in the amount based upon the total damages assessed by the jury, less the sum paid by the settling defendants. See Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. Wells, 634 So.2d 655 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), currently pending review before the Florida Supreme Court.

AFFIRMED.

WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MICKLE, Judge.

These consolidated appeals and cross-appeals arise from a final judgment rendered on a jury verdict in favor of appellees in a personal injury action. We conclude that the facts and the relevant law afford ample support for the jury’s verdict and the judgment entered pursuant to that verdict. Therefore, we affirm the issues raised in the main appeal without discussion. We also affirm ap-pellees’ cross-appeal challenging the set-off from the judgment of the amount paid in settlement by two co-defendants prior to trial. The trial court correctly awarded judgment against appellants in the amount based upon the total damages assessed by the jury, less the sum paid by the settling defendants. See Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. Wells, 634 So.2d 655 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), currently pending review before the Florida Supreme Court.

AFFIRMED.

WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

654 So. 2d 300, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4866, 1995 WL 259153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-sprocket-gear-inc-v-adams-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack