Martin S. Almaraz v. Harrah's Casino

3 F. App'x 568
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 1, 2001
Docket00-2514
StatusUnpublished

This text of 3 F. App'x 568 (Martin S. Almaraz v. Harrah's Casino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin S. Almaraz v. Harrah's Casino, 3 F. App'x 568 (8th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Martin Almaraz appeals from the district court’s 1 dismissal of his employment discrimination complaint for failure to serve defendant. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court except we modify the dismissal to be without prejudice. See 8th Cir. R. 47B; Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) (if service is not made within 120 days, the court, after notice to plaintiff, shall dismiss action without prejudice or direct that service be effected within specified time); Bullock v. United, States, 160 F.3d 441, 442 (8th Cir. 1998) (per curiam).

1

. The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tommie Bullock v. United States
160 F.3d 441 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 F. App'x 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-s-almaraz-v-harrahs-casino-ca8-2001.