Martin-Parry Corp. v. C. A. Bader Co.
This text of 16 F.R.D. 465 (Martin-Parry Corp. v. C. A. Bader Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant moves to require the plaintiff to produce documents for inspection. Plaintiff objects for several stated reasons, of which the principal is the failure to show good cause under Rule 34, 28 U.S.C.A. This objection is well taken. A showing must be made as to each document requested. Mere reference to the pleadings is insufficient.
Moreover, so far as a portion of the material requested is originals, of which defendant has copies, a request for admission of genuineness under Rule 36 would appear sufficient for defendant’s purposes.
The motion for order to produce is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 F.R.D. 465, 1953 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-parry-corp-v-c-a-bader-co-ctd-1953.