Martin Motor Sales, Inc. v. Anglero

13 A.D.3d 281, 786 N.Y.S.2d 304, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15689
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 28, 2004·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J.), entered January 30, 2004, denying the petition to vacate the arbitration award and granting respondent’s cross motion to confirm the award, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

[282]*282Pursuant to the Used Car Lemon Law (General Business Law § 198-b), the court properly found that the award was rational and the evidence sufficiently supported the arbitrator’s finding in respondent’s favor (see Mount St. Mary’s Hosp. v Catherwood, 26 NY2d 493, 508 [1970]). The record indicates that the same problems existed with respondent’s vehicle for more than three repair attempts by petitioner within the statutory period. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Friedman and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin Motor Sales, Inc. v. Anglero, 13 A.D.3d 281, 786 N.Y.S.2d 304, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15689 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

13 A.D.3d 281 (Martin Motor Sales, Inc. v. Anglero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gambino Ford, Inc. v. Mundy
35 A.D.3d 1283 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)