Martin McFall Messenger Anesthesia Professional Ass'n v. Gershuny

528 So. 2d 1206, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 965, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1499, 1988 WL 34010
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 20, 1988
DocketNo. 87-0918
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 528 So. 2d 1206 (Martin McFall Messenger Anesthesia Professional Ass'n v. Gershuny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin McFall Messenger Anesthesia Professional Ass'n v. Gershuny, 528 So. 2d 1206, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 965, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1499, 1988 WL 34010 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The appellant association, a group of physicians, appeals a trial court order denying its motion for attorney’s fees made after the association was exonerated by a jury of allegations of negligence and injury made by the appellee. We reverse.

The trial court denied the fees because associations or other groups of health care providers are not specifically designated in the medical malpractice attorney’s fee statute, section 768.56, Florida Statutes (1983), which provides in part:

[T]he court shall award a reasonable attorney’s fee to the prevailing party in any civil action which involves a claim for damages by reason of injury, death, or monetary loss on account of alleged malpractice by any medical or osteopathic physician, podiatrist, hospital, or health maintenance organization.

We cannot agree with the trial court’s interpretation of the statute. It is clear that the complaint by appellee was for medical malpractice by the group of physicians comprising the association. By seeking to hold these physicians liable, albeit as a collective group, we believe the appellee was subject to the provisions of section 768.56 in the event she failed to prevail.

We reverse and remand for the purpose of awarding appellant attorney’s fees.

ANSTEAD and STONE, JJ., concur. DELL, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gershuny v. MARTIN McFALL MESS. AN. PA
539 So. 2d 1131 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
528 So. 2d 1206, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 965, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1499, 1988 WL 34010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-mcfall-messenger-anesthesia-professional-assn-v-gershuny-fladistctapp-1988.