Martin, Mark Stephen v. State
This text of Martin, Mark Stephen v. State (Martin, Mark Stephen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NO. 01-01-00289-CR
MARK STEPHEN MARTIN, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 176th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 843,648
O P I N I O N
Appellant was charged by indictment with the offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child. Appellant pleaded guilty to the offense without an agreed recommendation as to punishment from the State. Following a pre-sentence investigation, the trial court found appellant guilty and assessed his punishment at 10 years in prison.
In his sole point of error, appellant argues that the trial court committed reversible error by failing to admonish him orally as to the sex offender registration requirements, as required by the guilty-plea statute. The record contains a written admonishment on sex offender registration requirements that complies with the Code of Criminal Procedure. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.13(d) (Vernon 1989). We overrule appellant's sole point of error and affirm.
Sam Nuchia
Justice
Panel consists of Justices Nuchia, Jennings, and Radack.
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Martin, Mark Stephen v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-mark-stephen-v-state-texapp-2002.