Martin, Mark Stephen v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 10, 2002·No. 01-01-00289-CR·Published

Opinion



In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________

NO. 01-01-00289-CR

____________



MARK STEPHEN MARTIN, Appellant



V.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee



On Appeal from the 176th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 843,648



O P I N I O N

Appellant was charged by indictment with the offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child. Appellant pleaded guilty to the offense without an agreed recommendation as to punishment from the State. Following a pre-sentence investigation, the trial court found appellant guilty and assessed his punishment at 10 years in prison.

In his sole point of error, appellant argues that the trial court committed reversible error by failing to admonish him orally as to the sex offender registration requirements, as required by the guilty-plea statute. The record contains a written admonishment on sex offender registration requirements that complies with the Code of Criminal Procedure. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.13(d) (Vernon 1989). We overrule appellant's sole point of error and affirm.



Sam Nuchia

Justice



Panel consists of Justices Nuchia, Jennings, and Radack.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin, Mark Stephen v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Martin, Mark Stephen v. State (Martin, Mark Stephen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.