Martin-Marietta Corp. v. Vargas

472 So. 2d 833, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1706
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 10, 1985
DocketBC-379
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 472 So. 2d 833 (Martin-Marietta Corp. v. Vargas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin-Marietta Corp. v. Vargas, 472 So. 2d 833, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1706 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

472 So.2d 833 (1985)

MARTIN-MARIETTA CORPORATION and Home Insurance Company, Appellants,
v.
Monserrathe VARGAS, Appellee.

No. BC-379.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 10, 1985.

Bernard J. Zimmerman and Rex A. Hurley of Zimmerman, Shuffield, Kiser & Sutcliffe, Orlando, for appellants.

Dorothy Clay Sims of Chalkley & Sims, Ocala, for appellee.

NIMMONS, Judge.

The employer and carrier (E/C) appeal from an order awarding permanent total disability benefits. We reverse and remand.

Although the claimant had reached maximum medical improvement with respect to her orthopedic injuries, the record is clear, and it is undisputed, that she has not yet reached maximum medical improvement from her accident-related psychiatric disorder. We have held that where a claimant has both orthopedic and psychiatric injuries, permanent disability benefits cannot be awarded prior to the claimant reaching maximum medical improvement from both disorders. Fuchs Baking Co. v. Estate of Szlosek, 466 So.2d 415, 418 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Rollins, 390 So.2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); South Carolina Ins. Co. v. Blackman, 380 So.2d 1144 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

Accordingly, the deputy's order is reversed and remanded for further proceedings at which the claimant shall be permitted to amend her claim to include temporary benefits, and additional evidence may be presented by the parties.

Reversed and Remanded.

WENTWORTH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

King v. Scotty's Distribution Center
699 So. 2d 308 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Stuck v. Richard's Cable TV
611 So. 2d 61 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Amfesco Duramil Division v. Guzman
596 So. 2d 732 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Grubb
570 So. 2d 1371 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
John Barley Memorial v. Gillam
550 So. 2d 1179 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Honeycutt v. Boswell Voyle Appliances
522 So. 2d 937 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
472 So. 2d 833, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-marietta-corp-v-vargas-fladistctapp-1985.