Martin Marietta Corp. v. Stewart

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Martin Marietta Corp. v. Stewart

527 So. 2d 238, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1254, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2251, 1988 WL 55646

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 25, 1988

DocketNo. BS-342

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 527 So. 2d 238 (Martin Marietta Corp. v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin Marietta Corp. v. Stewart, 527 So. 2d 238, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1254, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2251, 1988 WL 55646 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

Martin-Marietta Corporation and Scott Wetzel Services, Inc. (E/C) appeal from an interlocutory order of the deputy commissioner granting appellee Stewart’s motion to include the transcript and record of a separate worker’s compensation proceeding in the trial record of this case. Because appellants concede the non-finality of the order appealed, and have neither explicitly sought, nor made sufficient demonstration to obtain, this court’s certiorari jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 9.030(b)(2)(A), Fla.R. App.P., this appeal is dismissed. Our action herein is not intended to preclude review of this order upon any subsequent appeal of a final order.

SHIVERS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MILLS, Judge.

Martin-Marietta Corporation and Scott Wetzel Services, Inc. (E/C) appeal from an interlocutory order of the deputy commissioner granting appellee Stewart’s motion to include the transcript and record of a separate worker’s compensation proceeding in the trial record of this case. Because appellants concede the non-finality of the order appealed, and have neither explicitly sought, nor made sufficient demonstration to obtain, this court’s certiorari jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 9.030(b)(2)(A), Fla.R. App.P., this appeal is dismissed. Our action herein is not intended to preclude review of this order upon any subsequent appeal of a final order.

SHIVERS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

527 So. 2d 238, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1254, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2251, 1988 WL 55646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-marietta-corp-v-stewart-fladistctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack