Martin, Jr., R. v. Donegal Twp.
This text of Martin, Jr., R. v. Donegal Twp. (Martin, Jr., R. v. Donegal Twp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
RICHARD MARTIN, JR., RICHARD : No. 93 WAL 2023 FIDLER AND TAMMI IAMS : : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from v. : the Order of the Commonwealth : Court : DONEGAL TOWNSHIP, JAMES BAUER, : RANDY POLAN, ED SHINGLE, : KATHLEEN CROFT AND WASHINGTON : COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS : : : PETITION OF: DONEGAL TOWNSHIP, : JAMES BAUER, RANDY POLAN, : EDWARD SHINGLE, JR. AND KATHLEEN : CROFT :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all
remaining issue. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Whether Section 402(e) of the Second Class Township Code, 53 P.S. § 65402(e), is constitutional as applied when, pursuant to its terms, the number of township supervisors is reduced by referendum from five to three, thereby abolishing two supervisor seats?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Martin, Jr., R. v. Donegal Twp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-jr-r-v-donegal-twp-pa-2023.