Martin John Gilman v. Kestral Corporation

First Circuit

Martin John Gilman v. Kestral Corporation

181 F.2d 188, 85 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 383, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 4118

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedApril 26, 1950

Docket4470

StatusPublished

This text of 181 F.2d 188 (Martin John Gilman v. Kestral Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin John Gilman v. Kestral Corporation, 181 F.2d 188, 85 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 383, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 4118 (1st Cir. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

181 F.2d 188

85 U.S.P.Q. 383

Martin John GILMAN, Appellant,
v.
KESTRAL CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 4470.

United States Court of Appeals First Circuit.

April 26, 1950.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts; George C. Sweeney, Judge.

Maxwell James, New York City (Robert L. Thompson, Boston, Mass., on brief), for appellant.

Hector M. Holmes, Boston, Mass., (Robert P. Harvey, Springfield, Mass., on brief), for appellee.

Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and MARIS and WOODBURY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

An examination of the record and briefs discloses no occasion to add to or comment upon the opinion of the court below reported in D.C., 86 F.Supp. 765.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI