Martin Gonzales v. the State of Texas
Opinion
FILE COPY
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 12, 2022
No. 04-22-00660-CR
Martin GONZALES, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the County Court at Law No. 7, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 650198 Honorable Michael De Leon, Judge Presiding
ORDER On October 11, 2022, appellant’s counsel Ms. Nicolette A. Saenz filed a letter/motion stating “[p]ursuant to Texas Rules [sic] of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a), appellant requests that this Court dismiss this appeal upon this motion.” Rule 42.2(a) requires that a motion to dismiss a criminal appeal be signed by both the appellant and counsel. Furthermore, the motion does not contain a certificate of service.
Because appellant did not sign the motion, it is DENIED. Ms. Saenz is ORDERED to file a motion to dismiss that complies with Rule 42.2(a) and contains the appropriate certificate of service no later than October 27, 2022.
_________________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 12th day of October, 2022.
___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Martin Gonzales v. the State of Texas (Martin Gonzales v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.