Martin Ginsberg v. Robert Abrams, as Attorney General of the State of New York

Second Circuit

Martin Ginsberg v. Robert Abrams, as Attorney General of the State of New York

702 F.2d 48, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 29766

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMarch 10, 1983

Docket870, Docket 82-2307

StatusPublished

Cited by13 cases

This text of 702 F.2d 48 (Martin Ginsberg v. Robert Abrams, as Attorney General of the State of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin Ginsberg v. Robert Abrams, as Attorney General of the State of New York, 702 F.2d 48, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 29766 (2d Cir. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is taken from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, I. Leo Glas-ser, Judge, dismissing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus on grounds that petitioner was not a “prisoner” “in custody,” as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c). Petitioner’s argument that his removal from the bench of the Nassau Family Court, the revocation of his professional license to practice law, and his disqualification from being licensed as a real estate broker or insurance agent so greatly limited his economic mobility as to constitute “custody” is rejected and the dismissal of the petition is affirmed. Petitioner was convicted in the County Court of Nassau County, New York, of perjury before a grand jury looking into his receipt of money while serving as a New York State Assemblyman. People v. Ginsberg, 80 Misc.2d 921, 364 N.Y.S.2d 260 (1974), aff’d, 50 A.D.2d 804, 375 N.Y.S.2d 855 (2d Dep’t 1975). He was sentenced to an unconditional discharge, a disposition that entails neither imprisonment, fine, nor probation supervision. New York Penal Law § 65.20 (McKinney 1975). Fleming v. Abrams, 522 F. Supp. 1203 (S.D.N.Y.1981), aff’d, 697 F.2d 290 (2d Cir.1982); Ostrer v. Aronwald, 434 F.Supp. 396, 398-99 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 567 F.2d 551 (2d Cir.1977).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is taken from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, I. Leo Glas-ser, Judge, dismissing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus on grounds that petitioner was not a “prisoner” “in custody,” as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c). Petitioner’s argument that his removal from the bench of the Nassau Family Court, the revocation of his professional license to practice law, and his disqualification from being licensed as a real estate broker or insurance agent so greatly limited his economic mobility as to constitute “custody” is rejected and the dismissal of the petition is affirmed. Petitioner was convicted in the County Court of Nassau County, New York, of perjury before a grand jury looking into his receipt of money while serving as a New York State Assemblyman. People v. Ginsberg, 80 Misc.2d 921, 364 N.Y.S.2d 260 (1974), aff’d, 50 A.D.2d 804, 375 N.Y.S.2d 855 (2d Dep’t 1975). He was sentenced to an unconditional discharge, a disposition that entails neither imprisonment, fine, nor probation supervision. New York Penal Law § 65.20 (McKinney 1975). Fleming v. Abrams, 522 F. Supp. 1203 (S.D.N.Y.1981), aff’d, 697 F.2d 290 (2d Cir.1982); Ostrer v. Aronwald, 434 F.Supp. 396, 398-99 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 567 F.2d 551 (2d Cir.1977).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

702 F.2d 48, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 29766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-ginsberg-v-robert-abrams-as-attorney-general-of-the-state-of-new-ca2-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack