Martin Freeman Co. v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 379
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJuly 24, 1957
DocketNo. 61076; protest 271476-K (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 39 Cust. Ct. 379 (Martin Freeman Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin Freeman Co. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 379 (cusc 1957).

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise identified on the invoice as items X885A, X885B, and X885C are' not artificial fruits of alabaster, but are manufactures of alabaster, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 Cust. Ct. 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-freeman-co-v-united-states-cusc-1957.