Martin F. Troche v. Richard L. Thornburgh, Attorney General
This text of 948 F.2d 782 (Martin F. Troche v. Richard L. Thornburgh, Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
292 U.S.App.D.C. 190
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Martin F. TROCHE, Appellant,
v.
Richard L. THORNBURGH, Attorney General.
No. 90-5077.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Dec. 4, 1991.
Before HARRY T. EDWARDS, SILBERMAN and STEPHEN H. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 14(c). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's memorandum and order filed on January 30, 1990, be affirmed for the reasons stated therein.
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
948 F.2d 782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-f-troche-v-richard-l-thornburgh-attorney-ge-cadc-1991.