MARTIN ELECTRONICS v. Jones
This text of 871 So. 2d 277 (MARTIN ELECTRONICS v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MARTIN ELECTRONICS, and its Workers' Compensation Insurance Servicing Agent, United Self Insured Services, Inc., Appellants,
v.
Curtis JONES, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Susan Sapoznikoff Foltz, Esquire of The Foltz Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellants.
*278 Arthur C. Beal, Jr., Esquire of Arthur C. Beal, Jr., P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellants seek reversal of an order of the judge of compensation claims awarding nonprofessional attendant care benefits to claimant's wife. We affirm the award, except for the failure to credit appellants for the 17 days claimant spent in the hospital. See Constr. Finishing v. Combs, 569 So.2d 919, 921 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) (reversing the "JCC's award of attendant care ... for those periods during which claimant was hospitalized" because claimant did not meet his "burden of establishing the quantity, quality and duration of the necessary attendant care"); Aino's Custom Slip Covers v. DeLucia, 533 So.2d 862, 866 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988) ("[A]ttendant care benefits are not properly due the spouse for those periods when the claimant is being cared for by an attendant, therapist or nurse provided and paid for by the E/C").
Affirmed, as modified.
ALLEN, WEBSTER, and BENTON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
871 So. 2d 277, 2004 WL 546814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-electronics-v-jones-fladistctapp-2004.