Martin Clement Mullen-Cofee v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

986 F.2d 1364, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 8965
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Martin Clement Mullen-Cofee v. Immigration and Naturalization Service. Read the opinion of the Court — 976 F.2d 1375
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 6, 1993·No. 91-4050·Published

Opinion

986 F.2d 1364

Martin Clement MULLEN-COFEE, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

Nos. 90-3982, 91-4050.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

Jan. 6, 1993.

John E. Lund, Tampa, FL, for petitioner.

Donald A. Couvillon, Patricia A. Brock, and Richard M. Evans, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for respondent.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.

Prior report: 976 F.2d 1375.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before ANDERSON, Circuit Judge, MORGAN and JOHNSON, Senior Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The last sentence of the opinion is amended to read as follows:

For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the BIA's decision affirming the IJ's Order of Deportation, and the BIA's decision denying appellant's Motion to Reopen/Reconsider.

In all other respects, the petition for rehearing filed by petitioner is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Martin Clement Mullen-Cofee v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 986 F.2d 1364, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 8965 (11th Cir. 1993).

986 F.2d 1364 (Martin Clement Mullen-Cofee v. Immigration and Naturalization Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related