Martin Bettwieser v. Sandra K. Jeffery, F/N/A Sandra K. Dill Individually and as Administrator and Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Karl Bettwieser, And Kevin Jeffery

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 14, 2018
Docket05-18-01266-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Martin Bettwieser v. Sandra K. Jeffery, F/N/A Sandra K. Dill Individually and as Administrator and Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Karl Bettwieser, And Kevin Jeffery (Martin Bettwieser v. Sandra K. Jeffery, F/N/A Sandra K. Dill Individually and as Administrator and Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Karl Bettwieser, And Kevin Jeffery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin Bettwieser v. Sandra K. Jeffery, F/N/A Sandra K. Dill Individually and as Administrator and Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Karl Bettwieser, And Kevin Jeffery, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Order entered November 14, 2018

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01266-CV

MARTIN BETTWIESER, Appellant

V.

SANDRA K. JEFFERY F/N/A SANDRA K. DILL INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF THOMAS KARL BETTWIESER, DECEASED AND KEVIN JEFFERY, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law Bastrop County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 17-18735

ORDER The clerk’s and reporter’s records are overdue. By letters dated October 26, 2018, the

Court instructed appellant to provide, within ten days, written verification that he has paid or

made arrangements to pay for the record or written documentation that he is entitled to proceed

without advance payment of costs. Appellant has not complied. Rather, appellant filed on

November 2, 2018 a motion requesting a copy of the court reporter’s electronic audio recording

and an extension of time in which to request the records. A party is not entitled to a copy of an

electronic audio recording. See In re Daugherty, 2018 WL 3868170 at *5, No. 05-17-01436-CV

(Tex. App.—Dallas Aug. 15, 2018, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY the motion. We ORDER appellant to file, by November 30, 2018, written verification that (1) he has

requested preparation of the clerk’s record and (2) paid or made arrangements to pay for the

record or written documentation that he has been found entitled to proceed without advance

payment of costs. We caution appellant that failure to comply may result in dismissal of the

appeal without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).

By letter filed on October 26, 2018, Mary Angela Freeman, Certified Court Reporter,

informed the Court that appellant has not requested nor made arrangements to pay for the

reporter’s record. We ORDER appellant to file, by November 30, 2018, written verification

that (1) he has requested preparation of the reporter’s record and (2) paid or made arrangements

to pay for the record or written documentation that he has been found entitled to proceed without

advance payment of costs. We caution appellant that failure to comply may result in the appeal

being submitted without the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Sarah Loucks,

Bastrop County District Clerk, Mary Angela Freeman, Certified Court Reporter, and all parties.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Martin Bettwieser v. Sandra K. Jeffery, F/N/A Sandra K. Dill Individually and as Administrator and Personal Representative of the Estate of Thomas Karl Bettwieser, And Kevin Jeffery, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-bettwieser-v-sandra-k-jeffery-fna-sandra-k-dill-individually-texapp-2018.