Martin Bauer, Inc. v. Brands Within Reach, LLC.

S.D. New York

Martin Bauer, Inc. v. Brands Within Reach, LLC.

DecidedApril 11, 2022

Docket7:21-cv-05576

StatusUnknown

This text of Martin Bauer, Inc. v. Brands Within Reach, LLC. (Martin Bauer, Inc. v. Brands Within Reach, LLC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Martin Bauer, Inc. v. Brands Within Reach, LLC., (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

. i DOCUMENY □ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | ELECERONE □□□ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ear ate eee _ i we □□□ 7 recnnnnn nnnnnnanmenanncce samc □□ Poy ye Spy et - ~ q MARTIN BAUER, INC., coe oe 6 / / 2 Plaintiff, : ORDER

: 21CV 5576 (VB) BRANDS WITHIN REACH, LLC, : Defendant. ee eee eee eee eee XK As discussed at a conference held on the record today, at which counsel for all parties appeared, it is hereby ORDERED: □ 1, For the reasons stated on the record, defendant’s attorney’s motion to withdraw as counsel (Doc. #37) is GRANTED.

2 The next case management conference is scheduled for May 16, 2022, at 9:30

a.m, to be held in person at the White Plains courthouse, Courtroom 620. All counsel are directed to appear on that date. Defendant shall appear through newly-engaged counsel. 3. Defendant is reminded that limited liability companies may not appear in federal court without counsel. See Lattanzio v. COMTA, 481 F.3d 137, 140 (2d Cir. 2007) (per curiam). Furthermore, a non-attorney cannot act on behalf of a company. See id. Asa result, if defendant fails to engage legal representation or seek an extension of time to do so by the status conference on May 16, 2022, the Court may permit plaintiff to seek default judgment against defendant. A, Defendant’s prior counsel shall serve a copy of this Order on defendant and file proof of service on the docket by April 15, 2022. 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate attorneys Mark Steven Mulholland, Esq., and Jonathan Christopher Sullivan, Esq., from the docket, and remove them from the ECF notification list.

qd

6. The Clerk of Court is further directed to update defendant’s address on the docket to reflect the address below: _

Brands Within Reach LLC , c/o Zachert Private Equities GmbH Friedrich-Engels-Strabe 14 . 15537 Griinheide (Mark) Germany Dated: April 11, 2022 White Plains, NY SO ORDERED:

Vincent L, Briccetti United States District Judge .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

. i DOCUMENY □ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | ELECERONE □□□ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ear ate eee _ i we □□□ 7 recnnnnn nnnnnnanmenanncce samc □□ Poy ye Spy et - ~ q MARTIN BAUER, INC., coe oe 6 / / 2 Plaintiff, : ORDER

: 21CV 5576 (VB) BRANDS WITHIN REACH, LLC, : Defendant. ee eee eee eee eee XK As discussed at a conference held on the record today, at which counsel for all parties appeared, it is hereby ORDERED: □ 1, For the reasons stated on the record, defendant’s attorney’s motion to withdraw as counsel (Doc. #37) is GRANTED.

2 The next case management conference is scheduled for May 16, 2022, at 9:30

a.m, to be held in person at the White Plains courthouse, Courtroom 620. All counsel are directed to appear on that date. Defendant shall appear through newly-engaged counsel. 3. Defendant is reminded that limited liability companies may not appear in federal court without counsel. See Lattanzio v. COMTA, 481 F.3d 137, 140 (2d Cir. 2007) (per curiam). Furthermore, a non-attorney cannot act on behalf of a company. See id. Asa result, if defendant fails to engage legal representation or seek an extension of time to do so by the status conference on May 16, 2022, the Court may permit plaintiff to seek default judgment against defendant. A, Defendant’s prior counsel shall serve a copy of this Order on defendant and file proof of service on the docket by April 15, 2022. 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate attorneys Mark Steven Mulholland, Esq., and Jonathan Christopher Sullivan, Esq., from the docket, and remove them from the ECF notification list.

qd

6. The Clerk of Court is further directed to update defendant’s address on the docket to reflect the address below: _

Brands Within Reach LLC , c/o Zachert Private Equities GmbH Friedrich-Engels-Strabe 14 . 15537 Griinheide (Mark) Germany Dated: April 11, 2022 White Plains, NY SO ORDERED:

Vincent L, Briccetti United States District Judge .

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Martin Bauer, Inc. v. Brands Within Reach, LLC., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-bauer-inc-v-brands-within-reach-llc-nysd-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack