Martin Barnes, Maxie Gable, and George Persley v. BNSF Railway Company
This text of Martin Barnes, Maxie Gable, and George Persley v. BNSF Railway Company (Martin Barnes, Maxie Gable, and George Persley v. BNSF Railway Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-09-329-CV
MARTIN BARNES, MAXIE GABLE, APPELLANTS
AND GEORGE PERSLEY
V.
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY APPELLEE
----------
FROM THE 348TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT
We have considered AAppellants= Amended Motion To Dismiss.@ Although appellee BNSF Railway Company opposes appellants= motion, appellee has not filed a notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(c). Accordingly, it is the court=s opinion that AAppellants= Amended Motion To Dismiss@ should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellants, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.
DELIVERED: February 25, 2010
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Martin Barnes, Maxie Gable, and George Persley v. BNSF Railway Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-barnes-maxie-gable-and-george-persley-v-bns-texapp-2010.