Martin Barnes, Maxie Gable, and George Persley v. BNSF Railway Company

Opinion

                                COURT OF APPEALS

                                       SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                   FORT WORTH

                                        NO. 2-09-329-CV

MARTIN BARNES, MAXIE GABLE,                                        APPELLANTS

AND GEORGE PERSLEY

                                                   V.

BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY                                                     APPELLEE

                                               ----------

           FROM THE 348TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

                                               ----------

                 MEMORANDUM OPINION^[1] AND JUDGMENT

                                               ----------

We have considered AAppellants= Amended Motion To Dismiss.@  Although appellee BNSF Railway Company opposes appellants= motion, appellee has not filed a notice of appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(c).  Accordingly, it is the court=s opinion that AAppellants= Amended Motion To Dismiss@ should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellants, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL:  WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  February 25, 2010

---

^[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.