Martie v. M&M Bedding, LLC

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Florida
DecidedApril 10, 2020
Docket2:20-cv-00043
StatusUnknown

This text of Martie v. M&M Bedding, LLC (Martie v. M&M Bedding, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martie v. M&M Bedding, LLC, (M.D. Fla. 2020).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

KAREN MARTIE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No: 2:20-cv-43-FtM-38NPM

M&M BEDDING, LLC,

Defendant.

ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Clerk’s Default, filed on March 23, 2020. (Doc. 9). Plaintiff Karen Martie requests the Court to direct the Clerk to enter a default against Defendant M & M Bedding, LLC. (Id. at 1). Defendant failed to respond to the motion and time to respond has lapsed. Pursuant to Rule 55(a), “[w]hen a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party’s default.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Prior to directing the Clerk of Court to enter a default, however, the Court must first determine whether Plaintiffs properly effected service of process. Chambers v. Halsted Fin. Servs., LLC, No. 2:13-CV-809-FTM-38, 2014 WL 3721209, at *1 (M.D. Fla. July 28, 2014). Plaintiff has the burden of establishing effective service of process. See Zamperla, Inc. v. S.B.F. S.R.L., No. 6:13-CV-1811-ORL-37, 2014 WL 1400641, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 10, 2014). Rule 4(l) provides, “unless service is waived, proof of service must be made to the court. “ Service on an unincorporated entity can be made by any manner prescribed in Rule 4(e)(1) or “by delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to an officer, a managing or general agent, or any other agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process. .. . “ Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h)(1). Likewise, under state law, a limited liability company may be served through its registered agent. Fla. Stat. § 48.062(1). And § 48.062(1) also provides that a person attempting service may serve process on any employee of the registered agent on the first attempt at service. /d. In the motion, Plaintiff asserts she effectively served process on Defendant by serving its registered agent. (Doc. 9 at 1). The Affidavit of Service (Doc. 8) confirms the process server served Mark Hylind, as registered agent of Defendant. (Doc. 8 at 1). It appears service of process was effective. And M&M Bedding, LLC has not plead or otherwise defended this action. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: The Motion for Clerk’s Default (Doc. 9) is GRANTED and the Clerk of Court is directed to enter a Clerk’s default against M&M Bedding, LLC. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on April 10, 2020.

Lida Ee La ell. NICHOLAS P. MIZEL UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 48.062
Florida § 48.062(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Martie v. M&M Bedding, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martie-v-mm-bedding-llc-flmd-2020.