Martha Sue Nolen v. Tractor Supply Company
This text of 227 F. App'x 837 (Martha Sue Nolen v. Tractor Supply Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff Nolan appeals from grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant, Tractor Supply Company. This Georgia case was removed to federal court under diversity jurisdiction.
*838 Plaintiff was an invitee inspecting garden trailers displayed at defendant’s store. One large trailer that was upright, leaning against the storefront, fell and struck plaintiff. There is no evidence as to how the trailer was placed against the storefront. There is no evidence of what, how or if it was dislodged from its “at rest” position and fell. Plaintiff and a friend were the only persons present when it became dislodged and neither offered any further explanation.
The district judge issued a carefully considered ten-page order granting defendant’s motion. Georgia law controls. The case of Sams v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 228 Ga.App. 314, 491 S.E.2d 517 (1997) eliminates the doctrine of res ipsa loquitor as support for a prima facie case and no other evidence shows actionable negligence. The judgment is
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
227 F. App'x 837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martha-sue-nolen-v-tractor-supply-company-ca11-2007.